By MARTIN WILKINSON and KAREN WESTWOODAssociated PressThe dogs that come into the United States to visit family are more intelligent than the people who come to see them.
Dogs are more emotionally and intellectually engaged than people are, and their personalities are more complex and varied than those of people, according to research by researchers at the University of Washington and Duke University.
The research was published online in the journal Psychological Science, and it was conducted with the help of a team of scientists at the university, the University at Buffalo, and Duke.
The study included more than 400 dogs.
Researchers had the dogs participate in tests of their ability to recognize human faces, to associate human faces with positive or negative emotions, and to recognize other dogs in the house.
They also measured their ability in an ability test that measures the dogs’ ability to use tools to solve puzzles and find objects.
The results of the study show that dogs are more than intelligent animals.
They have higher intelligence, the researchers said.
What the researchers didn’t know was that the dogs were more intelligent in ways that might have implications for the social skills that dogs can perform, such as learning how to follow and follow a conversation, or how to use social cues.
Researchers also didn’t have a clear understanding of how dogs interact with each other.
The dogs in this study did not interact with humans in any way, the scientists said.
The findings also raise questions about whether dogs are really smarter than people, and if they’re truly intelligent.
They might be, but we don’t know.
If the study’s findings hold up, it could help researchers to better understand the cognitive abilities of dogs and other animals.
It would also provide a clearer picture of how humans and other species learn.
The University at Bills scientists said the dogs in their study did have intelligence, but it was based on a limited number of skills.
The ability tests were designed to measure skills that have to do with working with objects, using a variety of tools, and performing complex tasks.
The ability tests had the same questions that people ask, such for example, “How do you get a cup of coffee?” and “Which side of the fence should I cross?”
The ability test is designed to be a test of what a person can do and not do, said Jennifer J. Dabrowski, a research assistant professor in the College of Arts and Sciences and a member of the research team.
In some ways, the tests can be similar to the intelligence tests used to assess people, she said.
People can use their minds to figure out what a task is going to require, for example.
But a person with a limited amount of intelligence may have trouble understanding the question that’s being asked.
The tests are designed to allow a person to have some flexibility in making that determination.
“The questions that are asked are really good for that kind of analysis,” she said, “but it’s also important to note that there are lots of other ways of asking them, too.
Dabrowsky said her team plans to continue to use the tests to study the cognitive capabilities of dogs, including to understand how dogs can learn. “
When a dog is not asked those kinds of questions, she explained, “they can make mistakes that could be really bad.
“Dabrowsky said her team plans to continue to use the tests to study the cognitive capabilities of dogs, including to understand how dogs can learn.
But the dogs they used for the study were already highly intelligent animals that, if we’re to understand their intelligence, we must first understand how they learn, she added.
More AP stories: